So it comes out, for like the fifth time, that America's prewar intelligence was flawed and the Pentagon manipulated intelligence findings to suit their own ends (ie. lets invade Iraq everyone).
By DAVID S. CLOUD and MARK MAZZETTI
"Working under Douglas J. Feith, who at the time was under secretary of defense for policy, the group “developed, produced and then disseminated alternative intelligence assessments on the Iraq and Al Qaeda relationship, which included some conclusions that were inconsistent with the consensus of the Intelligence Community, to senior decision-makers,” the report concluded."
Here is the Executive Summary of the report
The
Los Angeles Times has also posted an article detailing the dispute between the Pentagon and CIA.
"There were like 26 points," in the Feith team's paper, Gimble said. "And essentially [experts at other agencies] disagreed with more than 50% of it, and either agreed or partially agreed with the remainder. When the team briefed Tenet and other senior CIA officials on Aug. 15, the audience was polite but unimpressed. Tenet described the meeting as "useful," Gimble said, but "in our interviews with him he later said that he only said that it was 'useful' because he didn't agree with it and he was just trying to, you know, nicely end the meeting."
The NY Times has recently published a popular OpEd piece on the whole issue. I wish someone, ahem Feith (aka the Dark Prince), would go to jail.
Editorial
"A report by the Pentagon inspector general has finally confirmed that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s intelligence office cooked up a link between Iraq and Al Qaeda to help justify an unjustifiable war."
"But the C.I.A. kept saying there was no reliable intelligence about an Iraq-Qaeda link. So Mr. Feith was sent to review the reports and come back with the answers Mr. Cheney wanted. The inspector general’s report said Mr. Feith’ s team gave a September 2002 briefing at the White House on the alleged Iraq-Qaeda connection that had not been vetted by the intelligence community (the director of central intelligence was pointedly not told it was happening) and “was not fully supported by the available intelligence.”
BTW: Cheney doesn't think the
VP is part of the executive branch. Be afraid, very afraid.
And MoreSo now Feith, on NPR, is disputing the accuracy of the report attacking his reports. He seems to think NPR is asking questions based on flawed intelligence (the actual report cited above).
CHADWICK: What the inspector general's report says is that your office presented findings which appeared to be based on a full reading of intelligence and they were not based on a full reading of intelligence.
Mr. FEITH: That's simply not correct. And I don't believe that's what the inspector general report says. I mean there's an enormous amount of loose talk about this and vague and loose allegations. And it's really - it's very difficult to refute stuff that is so, you know, so thoroughly inaccurate.
PS: Its good we are getting to the bottom of this now, when we can do something about it.